Sub-biochemical hypothyroidism: an exaggerated thyroid stimulating hormone response to thyrotrophin releasing hormone.

BACKGROUND: The availability of sensitive and specific assays for evaluation of the thyroid axis has allowed definition of thyroid disorders at subclinical stage. This has almost obviated the use of thyrothrophin releasing hormone (TRH) study. We describe here a group of patients with minimal signs of hypothyroidism having normal thyroid function tests (T3, T4, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)) and have shown exaggerated TSH response to TRH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Total 82 subjects were studied. Of these, 11 were age and sex matched controls, and 71 were patients. In all subjects TSH and other thyroid assays (T3, T4, FT4) were done by immunoradiometric assay (IRMA), and radioimmunoassay (RIA) respectively. Thyroid antibody was carried out by haemagglutination method. Results were compared to age and sex related normal ranges. To further investigate the status of thyroid axis, TRH study was carried out using standard protocol. RESULTS: Based on TRH study patients were grouped in three categories. Group 1 included 29 patients whose TSH response to TRH was normal. Group 2 included 20 patients with normal baseline TSH and exaggerated TSH response to TRH and Group 3 included 18 patients with baseline TSH in the range of 5 to 10 mu IU/ml and exaggerated TSH response to TRH. There was a significant difference to total T3 between group 1 and 3 (p < 0.05) but mean values were within normal limits. While no significant difference was observed in total T4 between controls and patient's group. Serum TSH values were high in group 3 as compared to controls and Group 1 and 2 (p < 0.0001). For Free T4 no statistical significance was observed between Group 1, 2 and 3. Thyroid antibodies were positive in 22.7% of patients in Group 2 and 33.33% in Group 3. CONCLUSION: We conclude from the present study that even with sensitive TSH assays TRH study still has a role to mark the early stage of hypothyroidism. Those with a normal or upper normal TSH with exaggerated response to TRH are termed as sub-biochemical hypothyroidism and can be considered for thyroid replacement therapy.

Comparative bioavailability of slow release diclofenac (Voveran SR) with enteric coated tablet and internationally used Voltaren Retard.

The objective of the study was to compare the enteric coated diclofenac sodium (Voveran), the slow release formulation developed in India (Voveran SR) and the internationally marketed formulation Voltaren Retard. Ten healthy volunteers were administered 100 mg each of the three formulations in a three-way crossover fashion. Blood samples were collected over 24 hours following administration of the drug; plasma levels of unchanged drug were determined by gas chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters for the three formulations were compared. The extent of the drug available from the three formulations was the same as the mean AUC values were not significantly different. Cmax and MRT values for the two slow release formulations were comparable but were significantly different from the values obtained with the enteric coated formulation. Tmax values for the two slow release formulations were similar while the enteric coated tablet had faster time to peak. Voveran SR is comparable to Voltaren Retard and has the distinct advantage of a slow release formulation in that its Cmax is much lower and levels are maintained over 12 hours and detectable upto 24 hours. This slow release formulation will offer clinical advantages of better compliance, relief of early morning symptoms and better tolerability over long term usage.